Questions about the ground of being,therefore explored in this essay through the study of cognitive processes/inter-ontological/ cognitive processes, in the understanding that the interactive processes in which existential forms are engaged are made possible by the ontological constitution of these forms.(In this regard,see also edward wilsons biophilia)STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Is it possible to explore the meaning of life through/within /in terms of/the framework of a PhD?Is there any such phenomenon/does/is there any/ any such existent as the meaning of life?Can such a meaning be universalised as the way I have indicated it here suggests or it simply a purely/primarily individual phenomenon?Is the very formulation of the conception not itself indicative of a pressuposition that negates a truly creative quest?In other words,the formulation here indicates/suggests a distinct existent that can be cognized by the human person and p[erahps embodied within/in relation to a text?
This implies an effort to integrate the multiplicity of existence in terms of a unitary interpretation,an interpretation that can be communicated,marshalled in terms of a sequence of letters,themselves communicating the kinds of meaning sequences that letters are created to signify.Such assumptions might be unavoidable since assumptions about the nature of the world are what constitute the very vehicle of our communication,of our way of seeing that world,the very ground,the armature of our consciousnesses could argue that a central quality of self reflexive thought/thinking is the sensitivity to their assumptions,and the effort to deconstruct them so as to move towards what could be understood as less of an assumption,more of a truth that can exist independently of our own determinations. that again,is another assumption. That truth is. That the true is so to the degree that it is independent of the constructions of the human subject.
Is it possible to explore the meaning of life through/within /in terms of/the framework of a PhD?Is there any such phenomenon/does/is there any/ any such existent as the meaning of life?Can such a meaning be universalised as the way I have indicated it here suggests or it simply a purely/primarily individual phenomenon?Is the very formulation of the conception not itself indicative of a pressuposition that negates a truly creative quest?In other words,the formulation here indicates/suggests a distinct existent that can be cognized by the human person and p[erahps embodied within/in relation to a text?
This implies an effort to integrate the multiplicity of existence in terms of a unitary interpretation,an interpretation that can be communicated,marshalled in terms of a sequence of letters,themselves communicating the kinds of meaning sequences that letters are created to signify.Such assumptions might be unavoidable since assumptions about the nature of the world are what constitute the very vehicle of our communication,of our way of seeing that world,the very ground,the armature of our consciousnesses could argue that a central quality of self reflexive thought/thinking is the sensitivity to their assumptions,and the effort to deconstruct them so as to move towards what could be understood as less of an assumption,more of a truth that can exist independently of our own determinations. that again,is another assumption. That truth is. That the true is so to the degree that it is independent of the constructions of the human subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment